![\"Best](\"https:\/\/pumble.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Best-screen-sharing-software-cover-1.png\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\nWhy trust us?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The apps we talk about are selected, tested, and written about by human reviewers who follow strict review and editorial guidelines. We pick solutions that are practical, purposeful, and can offer real value for the specific use case or business context we\u2019re covering \u2014 while also being justified in their pricing. Our methodology is transparent, clear, and available to everyone:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Learn more about our review methodology here \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n If you and your team are looking for an all-in-one communication tool that offers high-quality collaborative screen sharing while keeping all your messages and calls in one place, these are my top picks. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Pumble by CAKE.com is a team communication app<\/a> that stands out as a versatile screen-sharing solution. Its user-friendly interface and robust features make it ideal for virtual meetings and presentations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As someone who uses Pumble daily, I appreciate the high-quality video and audio<\/strong> during meetings. The easy-to-use <\/strong>screen sharing<\/strong><\/a> also makes presenting quick and frustration-free, without lagging or disruptions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the best parts is how fast it is to get a meeting going. With Pumble screen sharing, you can start a call directly from any chat \u2014 whether it\u2019s a 1-on-1 message, group DM, or channel. With one click, you instantly jump into a call and share your screen without leaving the workspace. <\/p>\n\n\n\n This creates a natural flow: you discuss something in a chat, hop on a call to show it, and continue the conversation right where you left off. <\/p>\n\n\n\n During a call, you can use the chat box to drop important information and share links while presenting. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Aside from audio and video calls<\/a>, Pumble also provides: <\/p>\n\n\n\n This makes it a perfect choice for companies looking to improve their overall team collaboration<\/a> and efficiency with a one-stop-shop tool for all communication.<\/p>\n\n\n Pumble pros:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Pumble cons:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n What\u2019s new in Pumble<\/strong><\/a>:<\/strong> Pumble recently expanded its accessibility and is now available in 5 languages, making it easier for more global teams to collaborate. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Available for:<\/strong> Desktop \u2014 Windows, Mac, and Linux; Mobile \u2014 Android and iOS<\/p>\n\n\n\n Pricing:<\/strong> Free plan available; paid plans from $2.49 per user per month, billed annually <\/p>\n\n\n\n Try Pumble\u2019s fast, easy screen sharing<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Slack is a popular communication workspace used by teams around the world. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It includes screen sharing through its Huddles feature, an instant, informal call you can start from any channel or DM. <\/p>\n\n\n\n I found it simple and easy to get the hang of, so teammates won\u2019t have much of a learning curve when getting started. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Up to 2 people can share their screens at the same time, which is helpful when comparing notes or reviewing multiple documents. <\/p>\n\n\n\n While testing, I also tried Slack\u2019s annotation tool. You can draw on the screen with a neon-yellow marker, but the annotations disappear after a few seconds, which I found inconvenient during longer explanations. <\/p>\n\n\n\n However, a bigger downside is that Slack\u2019s free plan only keeps 90 days of message history<\/strong>, which can make long-term collaboration challenging. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Its paid plans start at $7.25 per user\/month when billed annually, and all paid tiers cap meetings at 50 participants<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n Slack pros:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Slack cons:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Get unlimited free message history<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n What\u2019s new in Slack: <\/strong>You can choose whether to receive all new messages or only mentions and direct messages, and you can set exceptions for specific important channels. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Available for: <\/strong>Desktop \u2014 Windows, Mac, and Linux; Mobile \u2014 Android and iOS<\/p>\n\n\n\n Pricing<\/strong><\/a>: <\/strong>Free plan available; paid plans from $7.25 per user per month, billed annually<\/p>\n\n\n\n \ud83d\udca1 PUMBLE PRO TIP<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Want to see how Slack stacks up against Pumble by CAKE.com? Check out our comparisons:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Microsoft Teams is another versatile collaboration platform you\u2019ve likely heard of, but this time, we\u2019re focusing on its screen-sharing capabilities. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Its free plan is only available for personal use, while businesses need to opt for one of the paid plans. The free plan includes group calls for up to 60 minutes and 100 participants<\/strong>, as well as data encryption for meetings and calls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n After a quick screen-sharing set-up, I noticed that when presenting, the selected window is in a red frame, which helps keep track of where to move the cursor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Also, if your camera is on during screen sharing, you can choose from different views:<\/p>\n\n\n\n I find that the modes with backgrounds reduce presentation visibility by zooming it out. Also, being in front of the presentation using the \u2018standout\u2019 option may have you cover important information. Regardless, if you need to show your video alongside your presentation, I would still opt for the \u2018standout\u2019 version for a more zoomed-in clear view of the shared screen. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Overall, Microsoft Teams is a well-equipped platform for teams already using the Microsoft 365 suite. However, it can feel heavy or complicated for users who prefer simpler software. <\/p>\n\n\n Microsoft Teams pros:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Microsoft Teams cons:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n What\u2019s new in Microsoft Teams:<\/strong> Teams now includes Copilot, an AI assistant that helps summarize chats and generates messages from your conversations and calendar. This feature requires a Microsoft 365 Copilot license.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Available for:<\/strong> Desktop \u2014 Windows, Mac, and Linux; Mobile \u2014 Android and iOS<\/p>\n\n\n\n Pricing<\/strong><\/a>:<\/strong> Free plan available; paid plans from $4.00 per user per month, billed annually<\/p>\n\n\n\n \ud83d\udca1 PUMBLE PRO TIP<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n If you\u2019re not sure if Microsoft Teams is the best screen-sharing solution, take a look at our comprehensive comparison and research on an alternative:<\/p>\n\n\n\n If your team\u2019s communication needs are focused on video meetings, these tools are my top choices, built specifically for conferencing. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Zoom is a well-known video-conferencing platform with features suited for a range of collaborative needs, especially when hosting large audiences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The free plan allows up to 100 meeting participants, while paid plans increase that limit up to 1000<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Zoom allows up to 4 participants to share their screens simultaneously, record sessions, and use the in-meeting chat. <\/p>\n\n\n\n What stood out to me while testing the free version is how customizable the annotation tool is. You can draw with a pencil, choose colors and shapes, add text, spotlight areas, and even download your annotations as an image. This makes it easier to highlight key segments and keep participants engaged. <\/p>\n\n\n\n I also appreciate the presenter\u2019s flexible controls, such as: <\/p>\n\n\n\n One drawback is that presenters must have the Zoom app installed to share their screen, which can be inconvenient for quick, browser-based meetings. <\/p>\n\n\n Zoom pros:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Zoom cons:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Collaborate securely with Pumble<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n What\u2019s new in Zoom:<\/strong> Admins can now create custom AI agents that connect to other apps, letting Zoom\u2019s AI companion pull data and take action across tools. This feature requires the Custom AI Companion add-on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Available for:<\/strong> Desktop \u2014 Windows, Mac, and Linux; Mobile \u2014 Android and iOS<\/p>\n\n\n\n Pricing<\/strong><\/a>:<\/strong> Free plan available; paid plans from $13.33 per user per month<\/p>\n\n\n\n \ud83d\udca1 PUMBLE PRO TIP<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n If you want more information about Zoom and how it compares to Pumble by CAKE.com as a team communication app, check out our research:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Google Meet is a simple platform that works not only for video conferencing but also as a solid screen-sharing solution. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Its integration with other Google Workspace apps, such as Gmail and Google Calendar, make it a natural fit for teams that rely on this suite. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The free plan supports hour-long group meetings for up to 100 participants, with 1-on-1 calls lasting up to 24 hours<\/strong>. Paid plans increase the limit up to 1000 participants. <\/p>\n\n\n\n When starting a meeting, you can choose \u201cCompanion mode\u201d before joining. This option lets you be a presenter from the start of the call and is meant for hybrid meetings where a second screen is used. It disables the mic and speaker on the second device to avoid audio feedback, but you can still speak and listen using your primary device. <\/p>\n\n\n\n A meeting can host up to 10 simultaneous presentations at once. <\/p>\n\n\n\n One thing that I found particularly useful \u2013 if you\u2019re using a computer and a Chrome browser, you can present directly from Google Docs, Sheets, or Slides. This allows you to control the document while seeing yourself and other participants at the same time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n However, Google Meet isn\u2019t without its drawbacks. While the free plan is generous in some aspects, it lacks features like meeting recordings and advanced admin controls, which are only available in the paid plans.<\/p>\n\n\n Google Meet pros:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Google Meet cons:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n What\u2019s new in Google Meet:<\/strong> Google Meet now automatically shows a picture-in-picture window when you start screen sharing, so you can see participants while presenting. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Available for: <\/strong>Desktop \u2014 Windows, Mac, and Linux; Mobile \u2014 Android and iOS<\/p>\n\n\n\n Pricing:<\/strong> Free plan available; paid plans from $7 per user per month <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n High-quality screen sharing and collaboration in one place<\/p>\n\n When helping teammates with remote troubleshooting, you need a tool that lets you take control of their computer and guide them in real time. This is my top choice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n AnyDesk is a remote desktop software that allows users to share their screens and access other computers remotely. It is different from the rest of the software on this list because the screen sharing is not done within a call but during a remote desktop control session. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The remote desktop control gives remote control access as if you were physically present. You can switch to view-only mode if you don\u2019t need this feature while screen sharing. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Its free version, however, gives access to only 3 managed devices. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n I find that it\u2019s the most fitting for real-time tech support, which is exactly when the session recording feature comes in handy, to reference it later. <\/p>\n\n\n AnyDesk pros:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n AnyDesk cons:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Available for:<\/strong> Desktop \u2013 Windows, Mac, Linux, FreeBSD, and Chrome OS; Mobile \u2013 Android and iOS; Other \u2013 Apple TV and Raspberry Pi <\/p>\n\n\n\n Pricing:<\/strong> Free plan available for personal use; paid plans for businesses from $22.90 per month, billed annually, for single-person companies<\/p>\n\n\n\n For coding or collaborative debugging, this is the developer-focused tool I recommend your team use. <\/p>\n\n\n\n CoScreen is a niche collaboration tool built specifically for real-time, low-latency screen sharing \u2014 mainly for developers who need crisp resolution and shared control while working on code. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It\u2019s very simple to set up: once you\u2019re in a session, you can hover over any window on your desktop and click Share, or even select a specific screen region or terminal window to share. <\/p>\n\n\n\n While sharing a region, you can pause and resume, which is helpful when switching between sensitive files. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The one drawback I noticed is its lack of built-in features such as session recording or in-call chat. <\/p>\n\n\n\n CoScreen supports:<\/p>\n\n\n\n If you want to prevent others from taking control of your shared window, disabling remote control is just one click away. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The Standard plan is free and allows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n CoScreen pros:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n CoScreen cons:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n What\u2019s new in CoScreen: <\/strong>You can now share only a selected area of your screen, giving you more control over what participants see. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Available for: <\/strong>Desktop \u2013 Windows and Mac <\/p>\n\n\n\n Pricing: <\/strong>Free plan available; paid plan from $20 per user per month<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n Team communication made simple<\/p>\n\n Sometimes you don\u2019t need a meeting \u2014 you just need to show or present something quickly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Async sharing makes it easy to pass along updates, explain steps, or walk through issues without coordinating schedules. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Loom lets you record your screen, webcam, or both in just a few clicks. <\/p>\n\n\n\n When recording both, your webcam video appears in a selfie bubble that you can resize and reposition. <\/p>\n\n\n\n You can pause and resume recordings anytime, and viewers can leave emoji reactions or timestamped comments for easy feedback or questions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Editing tools are only available on paid plans, while transcription works even on the free tier. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The free Starter plan does come with limitations:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Because of these restrictions, Loom seems to me like a one-off solution for sharing short video messages rather than a long-term option. <\/p>\n\n\n\n For frequent async updates, an all-in-one tool like Pumble by CAKE.com with built-in video messaging and meeting recording may be a more practical choice.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\nTop all-in-one collaboration hubs <\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Pumble<\/a> by CAKE.com<\/a> \u2013 best for effortless team communication<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
![\"Screen](\"https:\/\/pumble.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Pumble-1.png\")
\n
\n
Slack<\/a> \u2014 best for quick screen sharing in Huddles<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
![\"Screen](\"https:\/\/pumble.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Slack-scaled.png\")
\n
\n
\n
Microsoft Teams<\/a> \u2013 best for teams using Microsoft 365<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
![\"Screen](\"https:\/\/pumble.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Microsoft-Teams-1.png\")
\n
\n
\n
Best dedicated video conferencing tools<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Zoom<\/a> \u2013 best for larger meetings<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
![\"Annotating](\"https:\/\/pumble.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Zoom-1.png\")
\n
\n
\n
Google Meet<\/a> \u2013 best for teams using Google Workspace<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
![\"Screen](\"https:\/\/pumble.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Google-Meet-1-scaled.png\")
\n
\n
![\"Illustration\"](\"https:\/\/pumble.com\/blog\/wp-content\/themes\/cake-blog\/theme\/images\/banners\/features@2x.png)
\n <\/picture>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n \n\n\n\nBest for technical support & remote control<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
AnyDesk<\/a> \u2013 best for providing technical support<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
![\"Screen](\"https:\/\/pumble.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/AnyDesk.jpg\")
\n
\n
Best for developers<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
CoScreen<\/a> \u2014 best for low-latency code sharing <\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
![\"Sharing](\"https:\/\/pumble.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/CoScreen-scaled.png\")
\n
\n
![\"Illustration\"](\"https:\/\/pumble.com\/blog\/wp-content\/themes\/cake-blog\/theme\/images\/banners\/landing-3@2x.png)
\n <\/picture>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n \n\n\n\nBest for asynchronous sharing<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Loom<\/a> \u2014 best for quick async walkthroughs <\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
![\"Leaving](\"https:\/\/pumble.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Loom.png\")