Top 10 Best Screen-Sharing Software for 2024 

In today’s digital landscape of daily virtual meetings, screen-sharing software has revolutionized the way teams connect and work together. 

Depending on the quality of the platform you choose, screen sharing can either facilitate seamless collaboration or disrupt your workflow and annoy all meeting participants. That is exactly why I have compiled a list of diverse screen-sharing software for you to pick the one that fits all of your team’s needs and preferences.  

From cutting-edge features to enhanced security measures, these platforms offer unparalleled flexibility and efficiency for screen sharing. 

Join me as I delve into the best screen-sharing software options to elevate your virtual meetings to new heights in 2024. 

Pumble – Best for effortless team communication

Pumble is a team communication app that also stands out as a versatile screen-sharing solution. Its user-friendly interface and robust features make it ideal for virtual meetings and presentations.

As someone who uses Pumble on a daily basis, I appreciate the high-quality video and audio during meetings as well as the easy-to-use screen sharing that helps facilitate presentations without any lagging or disruptions. 

While on a call, you can use the chat box to leave important information or share links during your presentation. But, keep in mind that these conversations are deleted once the meeting is over.  

Aside from audio and video calls, Pumble also provides: 

• Private and public channels,
• Direct messages, and 
• Voice and video messages. 

This makes it a perfect choice for companies looking to improve their overall team collaboration and efficiency with a one-stop-shop tool for all communication. 

Pumble pros:

• High-quality video meetings
• Unlimited number of users
• Sleek and easy-to-use interface

Pumble cons:

• Fewer integrations 

What’s new in Pumble: Pumble recently added a meeting recording feature, which is especially useful for when you need to take a second look at the material shared during meetings. 

Available for: Desktop — Windows, Mac, and Linux; Mobile — Android and iOS

Pricing: Free plan available; Paid plans from $2.49 per user per month

Google Meet – Best for teams using Google Workspace

Google Meet serves as a many-sided platform, not only as a video-conferencing tool but also for seamless screen sharing. Its integration with other Google Workspace applications, such as Gmail and Google Calendar, makes it a great fit for teams that prefer to use this business suite.  

The Google Meet free plan offers hour-long meetings for up to 100 participants. Nevertheless, 1-on-1 calls can last for up to 24 hours.
As far as call sizes go, the paid plans allow you to have up to 1000 participants in your video calls. 

When starting a meeting where you wish to share your screen, before you join, you can choose ‘Companion mode’. This option lets you be a presenter from the start of the call, but it disables your mic and speaker. The ‘Companion mode’ feature is mainly meant for hybrid meetings, to avoid any audio feedback when the presentation is done using a second screen. 

There can be a maximum of 10 simultaneous presentations in a meeting at a time.

One thing that I found particularly useful – if you use a computer and a Chrome browser, you can present directly to Google Meet from Google Docs, Sheets, or Slides. This way, you can control the document you are presenting while looking at yourself and the other participants. 

Google Meet pros:

• Integration with other Google apps (Google Docs, Google Slides, Google Calendar, etc.) 
• Integration with over 200 applications

Google Meet cons:

• Limited features (lacking waiting room for users of personal accounts and built-in whiteboards)

What’s new in Google Meet: Avoid video distractions in meetings – you can use the Audio and video lock feature to hide participants whose video feeds are distracting you and focus your meeting view solely on the presenter.  

Available for: Desktop — Windows, Mac, and Linux; Mobile — Android and iOS

Pricing: Free plan available; Paid plans from $6 per user per month 

AnyDesk – Best for providing technical support

AnyDesk is a remote desktop software that allows users to share their screens and access other computers remotely. It is different than the rest of the software on this list because the screen sharing is not done within a call but during a remote desktop control session. 

The remote desktop control gives remote control access as if you were physically present. If you do not need this feature while screen sharing, you can switch to view-only mode.  

Its free version, however, gives access to only 3 managed devices. 

I find that it’s the most fitting for real-time tech support, which is exactly when the session recording feature comes in handy, to reference it later.  

AnyDesk pros:

• Solid security
• Cross-platform compatibility

AnyDesk cons:

• Limited free version
• Paid plans are a bit expensive 

Available for: Desktop – Windows, Mac, Linux, FreeBSD, and Chrome OS; Mobile – Android and iOS; Other – Apple TV and Raspberry Pi 

Pricing: Free plan available for personal use; Paid plans for businesses from $12.90 per month, billed annually

Zoom – Best for larger meetings

Zoom is another well-known video conferencing platform. Its comprehensive features make it ideal for various collaborative endeavors, especially those that require a large audience. The free version of the app allows for up to 100 meeting participants, while paid plans rank that number up to 1000. 

Zoom allows for multiple participants to share their screens simultaneously, record sessions, and use the in-meeting chat. 

What stood out to me while I was trying the free version is the option to annotate while you are presenting. I find it to be a great tool for highlighting important segments of the shared screen and interactive engagement.

I also appreciate the presenter’s customization options, such as: 

• Choosing whether only the host can share their screen or all participants, 
• Choosing who can share their screen while a presentation is in progress — only the host or all participants, 
• Giving mouse and keyboard control to meeting participants, 
• Selecting who can annotate during the meeting, and 
• Choosing if participants’ names are shown while they are annotating.

Zoom pros:

• A large number of meeting participants
• High-definition video and voice
• Annotation feature

Zoom cons:

• Presenters must install the app 
• Limited free plan

What’s new in Zoom: A new screen share presenter layout that combines your video and shared screen in one frame. Presenters can choose between: 

• The content appearing over the shoulder of their video, 
• The presenter appearing in front of the content, or 
• The presenter and the content appearing side-by-side.

Available for: Desktop — Windows, Mac, and Linux; Mobile — Android and iOS

Pricing: Free plan available; Paid plans from $139.90 per year per user

Jitsi Meet – Best for simple and limitless screen sharing 

Jitsi Meet is an open-source video-conferencing platform and free screen-sharing software. It has been growing in popularity and stands out as a reliable and user-friendly platform, especially for small to medium-sized businesses looking for a cost-effective and secure solution. 

Its interactive whiteboard feature within a meeting is useful for drawing and brainstorming ideas directly on shared documents or blank canvases. 

It also has a Chrome extension for Google Calendar and Office365 integration. 

Hosts have control over meeting settings, such as 

• Muting participants, 
• Removing disruptive users, and 
• Managing permissions for screen sharing. 

This helps ensure smooth and productive meetings. 

I liked how easy it is to initiate a remote screen share in Jitsi Meet’s interface and how smooth and responsive the screen sharing was during my trial session. Ease of use is always appreciated, and I find it to make the experience more productive. 

Jitsi pros:

• No download or login required
• Cost-effective

Jitsi cons:

• Limited integrations
• Large-scale meetings may experience performance issues 

Available for: Web

Pricing: Free

Microsoft Teams – Best for teams using Microsoft 365

Microsoft Teams is another versatile collaboration platform that I am sure you’ve heard of before, but this time, we are looking deeper into its screen-sharing capabilities. 

Its free plan is only available for personal use, while businesses need to opt for one of the paid plans. It includes group calls for up to 60 minutes and 100 participants, as well as data encryption for meetings and calls.

After a quick and easy screen-sharing set-up, I noticed that when presenting, the window that you have selected is in a red frame, which helps keep track of where to move the cursor.

Also, if your camera is on during screen sharing, you can choose from different views:

• ‘Standout’ — You are in front of your presentation, 
• ‘Side by side’ — Your camera video is next to the presentation with a background, and 
• ‘Reporter’ mode — You are in front of the presentation with a background.

I find that the modes with backgrounds reduce presentation visibility by zooming it out. Also, being in front of the presentation using the ‘standout’ option may have you cover important information. Regardless, if you need to show your video alongside your presentation, I would still opt for the ‘standout’ version for a more zoomed-in clear view of the shared screen. 

Overall, it’s a well-equipped platform that I believe is the best choice for teams already using the Microsoft 365 productivity suite. 

Microsoft Teams pros:

• Great integration with third-party apps
• Free 30-day trial on all paid plans

Microsoft Teams cons:

• Most useful for teams using Microsoft 365 

What’s new in Microsoft Teams: AI features in the Premium plan

Available for: Desktop — Windows, Mac, and Linux; Mobile — Android and iOS

Pricing: Free plan available; Paid plans from $4 per user per month, billed annually 

Screenleap – Best for simple and efficient screen-sharing sessions

Screenleap is an easy-to-use screen-sharing platform that doesn’t require making an account or any app installation. 

It does have some limitations, like the fact that the host and participants cannot share their video while there is screen sharing in progress, only their audio. The platform also allows for video conferencing, but once the cameras are turned on, the screen sharing stops.  

The free version allows 40 minutes of screen sharing per day with up to 8 viewers. Also, two scheduled meetings and website integration are available per day, but no control sharing. 

While trying the app out, I enjoyed having the handy option of switching between: 

• Tabs, 
• Windows, or 
• The entire screen shared with the participants. 

I also liked being able to pause the screen sharing and jump right back in. 

Session participants are limited — they only have options to adjust how they view the presentation (actual screen size, fit to window, or view in full screen) and to leave the session.

Screenleap pros:

• No need for login or installation
• Ease of use

Screenleap cons:

• Limited free version
• Pricier paid plans

Available for: Web

Pricing: Free plan available; Paid plans from $15 per month, billed annually 

Zoho Meeting – Best for affordable screen sharing 

Zoho Meeting is a seamless and efficient platform for virtual collaboration. It boasts a range of features designed to enhance communication and productivity, including good screen-sharing capabilities. 

Its free version offers unlimited meetings and webinars for up to 60 minutes, but this time I utilized a 14-day free trial of a paid plan.

Apart from easy screen sharing and good-quality video, there were a few features that I quite liked while testing out Zoho Meeting. 

Aside from the chat for written communication during a meeting, there are Notes and Poll sections. The Poll option is great if there is a decision you wish to come to while in a meeting. It allows you to ask a question and choose the type of answer between single-choice, multiple-choice, or star rating. Just note that it is only available for the paid plans. 

Also, unlike other apps, your meeting notes and messages don’t disappear and can be viewed and downloaded after your meeting. 

Another handy feature is that while you are sharing your screen, you can choose the picture-in-picture option. This allows you to look at the other participants’ video cameras, while you are working in the tab/window that you are sharing. 

Zoho Meeting pros:

• No download necessary 
• 14-day free trial on paid plans
• Affordable paid plans

Zoho Meeting cons:

• Limited third-party integrations

What’s new in Zoho Meeting: Zoho Meeting now offers a Rooms add-on, allowing users to create dedicated virtual meeting spaces. This option is currently only available for the Meeting Professional paid plan. 

Available for: Desktop – Web, Windows, and Mac; Mobile – Android and iOS  

Pricing: Free plan available; Paid plans from $1 per month, billed annually

Webex – Best for enterprise-level features 

Webex is a widely used platform for video conferencing and screen sharing, offering a range of features tailored to real-time virtual collaboration. 

This time, I was using the free web version of the platform. 

My first impression is that I found the interface to be a bit complicated, especially compared to simpler screen-sharing solutions. 

The free version allows for meetings of up to 40 minutes with up to 100 attendees. The next option, i.e., the cheapest paid plan, offers meeting length of up to 24 hours and up to 200 participants. 

Webex also offers much larger video conferencing options. Its Enterprise meeting plan allows up to 1000 participants. In addition, it has a separate Webinars & Events segment where the attendees’ number goes up to 10,000. So, it would be a better fit for companies looking to invest in enterprise-level features to meet the needs of very large audiences.

When using the screen-sharing feature, I liked the simplicity of participants not needing to sign up — they can join as guests. 

Although the app lacks simultaneous screen sharing, I liked that before you share your screen, you can choose to optimize for text and images or for motion and video. This contributes to Webex’s popular high-quality video. 

Unlike all other screen-sharing software I’ve tried, Webex offers direct chat aside from its group chat within meetings. Also, the group chat has a mentions option, which is practical for when you need someone’s attention. 

Webex pros:

• High-quality video and audio

Webex cons:

• Its paid plans can get pricey

What’s new in Webex: AI enhancements, such as Audio Codec and Super Resolution, ensure great audio and video quality even in poor network conditions. 

Available for: Desktop — Windows and Mac; Mobile — Android and iOS

Pricing: Free plan available; Paid plans from $14.50 per month per user, billed monthly

Dead Simple Screen Sharing – Best for straightforward screen sharing 

As the name suggests, Dead Simple Screen Sharing is a straightforward and plain screen-sharing solution. It is very simple to use and offers only basic features. 

It is web-based and doesn’t require any signup or login. With it, your screen-sharing session is just one click away, which, I think, makes it a quick solution for any simple screen-sharing needs. 

The software is lightweight, requiring minimal system resources to run smoothly. But, it does lack advanced features such as annotation tools and remote control capabilities. 

One of its useful features is that multiple users can share their screen simultaneously, but you can’t change the tab/window you share while the screen sharing is in progress. 

It offers an unlimited amount of session time and thus far allows integrations with Slack and Rocket.Chat. 

If you need a hassle-free solution for sharing screens and do not require advanced features, Dead Simple Screen Sharing is the right option for you. 

Dead Simple Screen Sharing pros:

• Simple and easy to use

Dead Simple Screen Sharing cons:

• Limited features
• Outdated interface

Available for: Web

Pricing: Free

Key criteria for selecting top screen-sharing software

While I was testing out all of these screen-sharing software (and many more that didn’t make the list), I had a few factors in mind when considering what to recommend. 

These are the criteria you should be looking at when determining your screen-sharing requirements and priorities:

1. Ease of use
2. Compatibility
3. Screen-sharing quality
4. Collaboration tools
5. Features
6. Affordability

Let’s talk about each requirement in more depth.

#1 Ease of use

Ensuring both the host and participants can effortlessly navigate the platform is the first step to maximizing productivity. 

#2 Compatibility 

Compatibility across various devices and operating systems allows for seamless access and a broader audience. It is important to accommodate all team members, regardless of their preferred devices or platforms. 

#3 Screen-sharing quality

The quality of screen sharing, including resolution and latency, ensures clear and smooth collaboration, enhancing the overall meeting experience. 

#4 Collaboration tools

I found the availability of collaboration tools, such as annotation, remote control, and whiteboards, a valuable asset for successful engagement during a meeting. 

#5 Features

Other features to take into consideration include: 

• Chat functionality, 
• Recording capabilities, and 
• Integration with third-party apps. 

This makes for a versatile and efficient screen-sharing platform. 

#6 Affordability 

Screen-sharing software should not break your budget, which is why cost-effectiveness always needs to be taken into account. Ensure that the software you choose is accessible and sustainable for your team size and financial plan.  

Select a screen-sharing software that aligns with your teams’ objectives

Choosing the ideal screen-sharing software is a crucial step toward enhancing communication and productivity within your organization. The right tool can significantly impact how seamlessly your team collaborates. 

Explore our list of screen-sharing software options to find the perfect fit for your team’s unique needs. Take the time to test out different solutions to determine which one truly improves your workflow.